Clinical Epidemiology
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1283–93. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1283–93. Available from.
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(4):383–94. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(4):395–400. Available from.
- Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(4):401–6. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(4):407–15. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1277–82. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1294–302. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, et al. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1303–10. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2011 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 24];64(12):1311–6. Available from.
- Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S, Vale L, Oxman AD, Lord J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(2):140–50. Available from.
- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(2):151–7. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, Helfand M, Vist G, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(2):158–72. Available from.
- Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(2):173–83. Available from.
- Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Alderson P, Dahm P, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Jul [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(7):719–25. Available from.
- Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Internet]. 2013 Jul [cited 2024 Aug 24];66(7):726–35. Available from.
- Understanding sensitivity and specificity with the right side of the brain Tze-Wey Loong.
BASICS
- Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Bias in clinical research. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Jan [cited 2024 Aug 23];73(2):148–53. Available from.
- Jager KJ, Zoccali C, MacLeod A, Dekker FW. Confounding: What it is and how to deal with it. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 23];73(3):256–60. Available from.
- Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Diagnostic methods 2: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kidney International [Internet]. 2009 Aug [cited 2024 Aug 23];76(3):252–6. Available from.
- Van Stralen KJ, Stel VS, Reitsma JB, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy. Kidney International [Internet]. 2009 Jun [cited 2024 Aug 23];75(12):1257–63. Available from.
- Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Linear and logistic regression analysis. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 23];73(7):806–10. Available from.
- Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Wanner C, Zoccali C. Measures of effect: Relative risks, odds ratios, risk difference, and ‘number needed to treat.’ Kidney International [Internet]. 2007 Oct [cited 2024 Aug 23];72(7):789–91. Available from.
- Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Kramar R, Dekker FW. Measuring disease occurrence. Kidney International [Internet]. 2007 Aug [cited 2024 Aug 23];72(4):412–5. Available from.
- Grootendorst DC, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. Screening: why, when, and how. Kidney International [Internet]. 2009 Oct [cited 2024 Aug 23];76(7):694–9. Available from.
- Dekker FW, De Mutsert R, Van Dijk PC, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Survival analysis: time-dependent effects and time-varying risk factors. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited 2024 Aug 23];74(8):994–7. Available from.
- Noordzij M, Hooft L, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful. Kidney International [Internet]. 2009 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 23];76(11):1130–6. Available from.
- Tripepi G, Jager KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C. Testing for causality and prognosis: etiological and prognostic models. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Dec [cited 2024 Aug 23];74(12):1512–5. Available from.
- Van Dijk PC, Jager KJ, Zwinderman AH, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. The analysis of survival data in nephrology: basic concepts and methods of Cox regression. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Sep [cited 2024 Aug 23];74(6):705–9. Available from.
- Jager KJ, Van Dijk PC, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. The analysis of survival data: the Kaplan–Meier method. Kidney International [Internet]. 2008 Sep [cited 2024 Aug 23];74(5):560–5. Available from.
- De Mutsert R, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. The effect of joint exposures: examining the presence of interaction. Kidney International [Internet]. 2009 Apr [cited 2024 Aug 23];75(7):677–81. Available from.
- Stel VS, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Wanner C, Dekker FW. The randomized clinical trial: An unbeatable standard in clinical research? Kidney International [Internet]. 2007 Sep [cited 2024 Aug 23];72(5):539–42. Available from.
- Jager KJ, Stel VS, Wanner C, Zoccali C, Dekker FW. The valuable contribution of observational studies to nephrology. Kidney International [Internet]. 2007 Sep [cited 2024 Aug 23];72(6):671–5. Available from.
- Session 4: 8th August 10 How to do Literature Search-Dr Edwin Fernando.
- Session 3:8th August 08 Good research Question Well Begun Half Done-Prof Dr Usha Dutta
- Session 3:8th August 09 Observational Studies Cross Section,Case Control, Cohort Study-Dr Swapnil.
- Session 5: 16th August Types of Data and Statistical Tests Dr K T Harichandra Kumar.
- Session 7: 23rd August Correlation, Linear regression & Logistic regression Prof Dr N Sreekumaran.
- Session 6: 22nd August Introduction to Intervention studies Prof Dr Priyamvada P S
- Session 9 30th August How to write a study proposal Prof Dr Valentine Lobo
- Session 8 29th August Introduction to Survival Analysis and Cox Regression Prof Dr Narayan Prasad.
- Session 10 September 5 Critical Appraisal of an RCT Dr Atul Mulay
- Session 10 September 5 Critical Appraisal of an RCT paper Prof Dr Sourabh Dutta
- Session 11 September 6 How to find funding for research! Dr Madhuri Dutta
- Session 11 September 6 How to Make an effective presentation Dr Shirish Yande
- Session 12 September 12 1-How to get ahead in academic nephrology what to do and what not to do.
- Session 12 September 12-2 Ethical and Legal aspects of a research study Prof Dr Mohan Gupte
- Session 13 September 13-1 How to write manuscript Dr Amrita Prayag
- Session 13 September 13-2 Use of citation software Dr Gauri Oka
- Advanced session1 Oct 3-Inagural Address-Dr Tripti Khanna
- Advanced session2 Oct 4-Advanced Statistics Descriptive Statistics-Dr K T Harichandra Kumar
- Advanced Session 10-Nov 1-Randomised Cross Over Designs-Dr Pryamvada PS
- Advanced Session 9-Oct 31-Systematic Review Session 2-Dr Swapnil Hiremath
- Advanced Session 9-Oct 31-Systematic Review Session 2-Dr Atul Mulay
- Advanced Session 7-Oct 24-Meta Analysis 2 and use of REV-MAN software -Dr Swapnil Hiremath
- Advanced Session 7-Oct 24-Meta Analysis1-Dr Atul Mulay
- Advanced workshop session-6 Oct 18-Animal Experimentation in India-Dr Mohan Rajapurkar
- Advanced workshop session 5 Advanced Observational Studies-How to read a paper-Prof Dr Sourabh Dutta
- Advanced Session-4 Oct 11-2 Correlation Simple and Multiple Linear Regression-Dr K T Marichandra
- Advanced Session 3-Oct 10-How to read a paper of Case Control Study-Prof Sourabh Dutta
- Advanced session2 Oct 4-Advanced Statistics Descriptive Statistics-Dr K T Harichandra Kumar
Section Contributors
